Location of cognitive functions and cortical electro-chemical efficiency
It seems
odd to me that even when I discussed the orientation at a conference on
personality type there seemed to be quite a bit of disbelief that the functions
could be located in specific quadrants of the brain. I don’t know about some
other people but it makes sense to me that the "sensing" function should reside
in an area of the brain with three "sensory lobes" and that subjective
interpretation should also reside in an analogous structure. Additionally it
certainly makes sense to me that the most "abstract" and most distinctly human
specific functions should reside in parts of the brain (frontal lobes) that are most uniquely
developed in humans and least likely found in other animals. I
think the confusion has been caused by imprecise testing and insufficient
understanding of the complexity of thought. For localizing function it is
necessary to determine the most discrete forms of data to test. (See pattern
recognition and matrix IQ testing.)
The Physiology of Jung’s Four Functions & Their Organization
By Katherine Benziger, Ph.D., © March 1998; September 1999
“With respect to the human cortex, functional specialization is said to exist in
that: (1) the cortex is clearly divided into four almost equal elements, in that
each hemisphere or half is further divided by a central or rondalic fissure
which separates the frontal lobe on each side from posterior portion of the
hemisphere, today known as the posterior cortical convexity; (2) each of these
four areas can be shown function differently; and (3) each contributes
differently based on its unique specialized capabilities.”
“Significantly, among neuro-physiologists there exists some disagreement about
functional specialization. Some researchers argue, when looking from a
particular perspective, that the brain is also highly integrated and seemingly
at times redundant. Auditory information is processed in many areas. Indeed,
even music is processed in many areas. Moreover, language in some persons can be
shown to involve all four regions of the cortex. The key to this discussion is
that the cortex is both specialized and integrated, much as an assembly-line or
a computer.”
- Haier, Richard. Cortical Glucose Metabolic Rate Correlates of Abstract
Reasoning and Intelligence, Studied with Positron Emission, by Haier et al.
unpublished paper from January 1988.
- Haier, Richard. The Study of Personality With Positron Emission Tomography in
Personality Dimensions & Arousal, ed. by Jan Stvelan & Hans J. Eyesenck. Plenum
Publishing Company, 1987.
I would like to read Dr. Haier’s original research. While I find Dr.
Benziger’s conclusions extremely informative I couldn’t help noticing that she
used the word "most" in the following statement,
“Moreover, Haier’s research has shown repeatedly that most people have one
area which enjoys a much lower level of electrical resistance – using only one
one-hundredth the oxygen / energy - when compared with all the other areas of
that person’s cortex.”
What does that mean? Here is a bit of intuitive exploration I conveyed to a
friend on the matter. You can skip it if you prefer, as it is just speculative
rambling.
"Right now I would not call them a 17th type. I would actually
propose there are two and perhaps four other base types making 18 or 20. They
would be "Ixxx & Exxx standard" and "Ixxx & Exxx super" using an enhanced MB
notation. If there were only one, I would refer to it as the zero personality
and not the 17th. I don’t really have too make much of a case for
it if you accept Dr. Haier’s research. Apparently, there are indeed "some"
people who do not have a quadrant that is 100% more efficient than the other
three quadrants. This might make the persons functional preference xx. How
their environment dictated the use of those functions would determine what
kind of personality they would appear to have.
Functional efficiency is one factor and the speed of their RAS determines E
or I so that determines how they use their functions. So an xx would be Ixxx
or Exxx. I designated a standard and a super because I have many questions
regarding Dr. Haier’s subjects that showed no dominant quadrant. If you had an
individual without a dominant (efficient) quadrant and that quadrant consumed
100% less glucose and oxygen (energy) as the other three quadrants what is the
actual amount of energy consumed? Let’s give it a value of 1eu and the other
three quadrants 100eu. If Dr Haier found that some subjects did not have a
dominant (efficient) quadrant what did they have? Did all quadrants consume
100eu or did all consume 1eu? If you had a subject that consumed 100eu in each
quadrant I added the "standard" designation because this person would stay out
of trouble (psychically healthy) and live a well adjusted and balanced life.
On the other hand if a subject used only 1eu in all quadrants they would
possibly be a kind of super human intelligence! Somewhere I read or heard that
while a person’s brain is only 5% of their body’s mass it typically consumes
30% of their energy so here you would have a person who’s brain consumes
comparatively very little energy in order to operate. The speculation goes on
and on. Do some people have two or three quadrants that consume only 1eu? How
about the speed of the cerebellum, the corpus collosum, conversion from short
term to long term memory, etc.? Is the 1eu and 100eu relative? Does this help
explain variation of IQ?"
|