







|
|
“It is a mistake to believe that
a science consists in nothing but conclusively proved propositions, and it
is unjust to demand that it should. It is a demand only made by those who
feel a craving for authority in some form and a need to replace the
religious catechism by something else, even if it be a scientific one.”
-
Sigmund Freud
"In recent years, the scientific method and its underlying
empirical methods has been
studied by
Thomas Kuhn. He suggested
that
sociological mechanisms were
important in how science works. In this view, a scientific revolution occurs
when scientists encounter anomalies which cannot be explained by the
universally accepted paradigm within which scientific progress had thereto
been made. Once new discoveries are made that cannot be reconciled with a
current paradigm, and these results are repeatedly independently confirmed
by other scientists, then the scientific community is forced to create a
new paradigm in line with the
evidence."
-
Do scientists really follow the scientific method?, Scientific
method, From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
“There is no place for dogma in science. The
scientist is free to ask any question, to doubt any assertion, to seek for
any evidence, to correct any error. Where science has been used in the past
to erect a new dogmatism, that dogmatism has found itself incompatible with
the progress of science; and in the end, the dogma has yielded, or science
and freedom have perished together.”
-
J. Robert Oppenheimer
This is the section where I put several pieces together and attempt to make
sense of them in order to alert people of 'possible' upcoming events.
Most or all of the things on these pages may initially appear completely absurd. This
is because you would initially compare them to what you consider normal. I allowed my
imagination (extroverted intuition) free reign because I believe that when extremely advanced
technology is involved anything is possible. As Arthur C. Clark
said, "Any sufficiently advanced technology
is indistinguishable from magic." Or from Robert Heinlein in the book Time Enough For
Love, "One man's 'magic' is another man's engineering. 'Supernaturalism'
is a null word." Or as I've expressed it, there are no
supernatural forces, there are only natural forces we've yet to fully
comprehend.
Shermer's Last Law,
By Michael Shermer, January 2002
As scientist extraordinaire and author of an empire of science-fiction
books, Arthur C. Clarke is one of the farthest-seeing visionaries of our
time. His pithy quotations tug harder than those of most futurists on our
collective psyches for their insights into humanity and our unique place in
the cosmos. And none do so more than his famous Third Law: "Any sufficiently
advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
This observation stimulated me to think about the impact the discovery of an
extraterrestrial intelligence (ETI) would have on science and religion. To
that end, I would like to immodestly propose Shermer's Last Law (I don't
believe in naming laws after oneself, so as the good book says, the last
shall be first and the first shall be last): "Any
sufficiently advanced ETI is indistinguishable from God."
“God is typically described by Western religions as
omniscient and omnipotent. Because we are far from possessing these traits,
how can we possibly distinguish a God who has them absolutely from an ETI
who merely has them copiously relative to us? We can't. But if God were only
relatively more knowing and powerful than we are, then by definition the
deity would be an ETI!”
…
“Ergo, the probability that an ETI only slightly more advanced than we are
will make contact is virtually nil. If we ever do find an ETI, it will be as
though a million-year-old Homo erectus were dropped into the 21st century,
given a computer and cell phone and instructed to communicate with us. The
ETI would be to us as we would be to this early hominid--godlike.”
...
Although science has not even remotely destroyed religion, Shermer's Last
Law predicts that the relation between the two will be profoundly affected
by contact with an ETI. To find out how, we must follow Clarke's Second Law:
"The only way of discovering the limits of the
possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible."
Ad astra!
After consideration of what is
possible I then went on a search for identifying explanations that were
most probable given the admittedly fantastic nature of the evidence. While I could do as others
have and draw from typical prophecy and various
scriptures I also find a lot of relevant concepts in several pieces of
science fact and fiction. I've
read several books and seen films that seem related to contemporary international events.
So you say, "Hey, that doesn't make
sense. How could they contain significant concepts?". Well remember in one of my earlier papers when I said all of
the cognitive functions were multi-dimensional and there were features of
Intuition that sound too bizarre to discuss at that time. Well for this
section to make sense, you need to consider that apparently intuition and quantum
(dark) energy
enable the use of mental telepathy. As fantastic as that seems
there is a significant quantity of theoretical and scientific evidence as
well as credible personal testimony from such people as Carl Jung, Albert
Einstein, John Lilly and others. The fundamental science underlying
telepathy is quantum entanglement which also forms the basis for
quantum
computing and teleportation (see links below).
In the hypothetical stage, scientists use their own
creativity (currently not well understood), or any other methods available,
to invent possible explanations for the phenomenon under study. For some
philosophers of science the most important aspect of an explanation is that
it must be
falsifiable, whereby a contrary fact from an experiment must be possible
(in other words, if no experiment can ever demonstrate the hypothesis to be
false, the hypothesis is unscientific though perhaps true).
The scientist should also be--but need not be and often is not--impartial,
considering all known evidence, and not merely the evidence which supports
the hypothesis being developed. This makes it more likely that the
hypotheses formed will be relevant and useful.
-
Hypothesis, Scientific method, From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
Several INFPs believe they are
psychic. Well, before some of my experiences I attributed their
perception to their unconscious awareness and use of extroverted intuition
in seeing larger patterns and the ability to understand people and
motivations (Fi). One INFP friend said she could quickly determine a person's
"vice". Well I'm not saying that any human on earth has the ability to
transmit thoughts to another person but I have every reason to believe that
someone (perhaps an AI) with access to technology based on quantum entanglement can both read peoples thoughts and put little intuitive ideas in
peoples heads. My perception of this is more like 'shared
consciousness' because the voice or ideas in my head (on several occasions
over the span of about two weeks) seemed like mine at the
time I had them. It's similar to the voice in your head when you read to yourself. It's only later when I considered my thoughts,
motivations, actions and the results do I realize that my behavior was out of
character for me. The results have to date been 'very' informative and
at times entertaining. Even the writers of The Matrix have wondered
out loud, "Sometimes I wonder where I get my ideas". I think one
of them said that in an interview or on the DVD. Hmm, It seems Dr.
John Lilly died September 30th, (2001). I had never heard of him before but I
was familiar with some concepts of his work. He apparently invented the
isolation/sensory deprivation tank and did cognitive research with
dolphins. Please consider this excerpt from a page dedicated to him
and the related supporting evidence;
Isaiah
65:1 I am sought of them that asked not
for me; I am found of them that sought me not: …
Dr. John C. Lilly,
M.D. January 06, 1915 - September 30, 2001
"Many people have claimed
to have received messages via interstellar telepathy. Saul-Paul Sirag, a
physicist, has said that over a hundred scientists in the United States have
had this experience, but are reluctant to admit it publicly, for obvious
reasons. Buckminster Fuller, renowned scientific philosopher, has stated
that he sometimes thinks that he has received messages from interstellar
telepaths. Dr. John Lilly, psychoanalyst, neuro-anatomist, cyberneticist,
mathematician, and pioneering dolphin researcher, has made allusions to
contact during the early seventies from interstellar entities he terms the
"Cosmic Coincidence Control Center"." (See
also synchronicity, collective unconscious and deus ex machina
here.)
QLAOT -- Quantum
Linguistic Aspects of Telepathy
"Saul-Paul Sirag, a leading consciousness physicist, told
a 1979 Transpersonal Psychology plenary audience (in a talk entitled
Consciousness and Physics ) that Einstein spoke favorably of telepathy at
least three times in print (eg, Quantum theory seems to imply telepathy.)
Its existence is therefore recognized in physics (as was validated at a
recent Conference on The Nature, Role, and Power of Thought -- reviewed next
issue], independently of recognition in either psychology or linguistics. My
favorite quantum physics cartoon book, Spacetime and Beyond (Bob Toben, Fred
Wolf and
Jack Sarfatti), gives an excellent and plausible account of how
information can move instantaneously through the wormholes of cosmic foam
called space. Sarfatti gives a simple diagram of how telepathy works in an
appendix to Jeffrey Mishlove's Roots of Consciousness, and elsewhere talks
about the faster-than-light Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen transmissions as
information without transportation. Finally, a somewhat technical but
satisfying account of biological, structural, mathematical, and other
theoretical considerations of telepathy can be found in Andrija Puharich's
Beyond Telepathy."
Quantum Teleportation, IBM Research
Until recently, teleportation was not taken seriously by scientists,
because it was thought to violate the uncertainty principle of quantum
mechanics, which forbids any measuring or scanning process from extracting
all the information in an atom or other object. ...But the six scientists
found a way to make an end-run around this logic, using a celebrated and
paradoxical feature of quantum mechanics known as the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen
effect.
Atom Experiment Brings Teleportation a Step Closer
By Reuters, 26 September 2001
“LONDON (Reuters) - Physicists in Denmark have made two samples of
trillions of atoms interact at a distance in an experiment which may bring
Star Trek-style teleportation and rapid quantum computing closer to reality. “
“It involves quantum entanglement -- a mysterious concept of entwining two or
more particles without physical contact. Albert Einstein once described it as
``spooky action at a distance.''
Scientists Report 'Teleported' Data
Mon Jun 17, 2002
By PETER O'CONNOR, Associated Press Writer
CANBERRA, Australia (AP) - Australian scientists said Monday they had
successfully "teleported" a laser beam encoded with data, breaking it up and
reconstructing an exact replica a yard away.
"We have taken a beam of laser light ... and completely
destroyed it and then made measurements of the destroyed laser beam and then
took the measured results to the other side of the lab and reconstructed an
exact replica of what we have destroyed," said Lam.
Teleporting a laser beam involves destroying and replicating billions of
photons.
Lam said he believes the process, called "quantum teleportation" and which takes
a nanosecond — one billionth of one second — will soon be used for
teleporting matter.
|