Articles in Jungian Psychology
The Physiology of Type
By Katherine Benziger, Ph.D.
Introduction
This is an essay on the physiolgy of Type. For Jung, the
word Type was a convenient short hand which allowed him to identify with
one label, both a person’s preference for either Introversion or
Extraversion, and as well their Natural Lead Function: Thinking, Sensing,
Feeling, Intuition. He might, for example, have referred to one person as
"An Introverted Feeler" and another as "An Extraverted Sensor." As it
happens, today the physiological foundations for both elements of Jung’s
model are known. This is particularly exciting as it not only confirms
Jung’s observations as science, but as well provides exciting new
insights.
Part 1:
The Physiology of Jung’s Extraversion
Introversion
So much has been discovered in the past ten years that it
is now possible to be relatively certain about the physiological bases for
the personality characteristics Dr. Jung identified as Introversion and
Extraversion. What’s more, it is now possible to provide scientific
support for Jung’s position that it is more important for us as
individuals to satisfy our introverted / extraverted needs than it is for
us to honor and use our natural lead function.
To begin to understand these elements of Jung’s model
better, it is important to develop a working familiarity with the
following physiological terms:
- R.A.S. - Reticular Activating System
The Reticular Activating System, located in the core of
the brain stem and linked directly to the Frontal Lobes by a substantial
conduit of neurons, functions to regulate our arousal -- that is, the
degree and quality of our sleep, REM, or wakefulness.
Understanding the role of the reticular activating system
in human "thinking" is important to fully appreciating Dr. Jung’s and Dr.
Benziger’s work. There are three distinct ways in which understanding the
functioning of our R.A.S. promotes a deeper appreciation of Jung’s
model.
First, as the regulator of our stable level of
wakefulness, it sets and maintains how much information or stimulation we
take in, second per second, while we are awake.
Secondly, our R.A.S. when affected by anxiety or our
fight-or-flight response rapidly and temporarily increases our arousal
level. This enables us to be suddenly and fully alert, seeing much more
than we normally see, noticing much more than we normally notice, when we
are in danger. It prepares us to successfully respond to danger.
Finally, as a major communication link between our
Frontal Lobes and our energy reserves in the brain stem, our R.A.S. makes
it possible for us to obtain additional energy to focus our attention
when, directed to do so by our Frontal Lobes. This direct provision of
additional energy to focus on a problem, experienced most powerfully by
people with a natural preference in one of the Frontal Lobes – in either
Thinking or Intuition - explains how and why Frontal thinkers – with a
lead in Thinking or Intuition - tend to be more energetic than Basal
thinkers, whose natural lead function is Sensation or Feeling. Frontals
are often seen as: fast moving, fast talking, and intense or driven, Type
A's - workaholics. Understanding this internal functioning explains why
many Frontals are in a real sense addicted to problem solving. What’s
more, Frontals actively choose to do problem solving because of this
energy high.
The Set Point is the typical, stable level at which a
given human system operates.
We all have many set points. We have: our
normal, typical weight; our normal heart rate; our normal breathing rate;
and, as well, our normal waking arousal level. In all cases, a change in
our environment or activity level may cause a temporary alteration in the
affected system. If we over eat for several days, we put on weight. If we
run, our heart beats faster. If we become worried, our arousal level will
go up. However, for a healthy person such increases are temporary. When
the increased activity or environmental stimulus diminishes, our system
re-balances quite naturally to its set point.
Our arousal level identifies the amount and speed of our
brain’s activity. Of necessity, our arousal level varies from walking to
dreaming, to sleeping. Moreover, when we shift from sleeping to waking we
always "wake up" at the same level of arousal. In other words, we each
have a stable level of arousal in the waking state, which may be seen as
the set point for our waking arousal -- that is how alert we are when we
are simply sitting, fully awake, but not actively stimulated to "thinking"
in a focused way about a problem.
Concerning arousal, Hans Eysenck's research suggests that
humans are distributed along a continuum according to a normal bell curve.
That is, fifteen percent (15%) are very aroused, fifteen percent (15%) are
only minimally aroused, and seventy percent (70%) are in the middle.
Importantly, those of us who are highly aroused take in
much more information second per second than the average person and may
subsequently need to diminish or limit the "volume" of the stimulation
around us. This leads others to see us as introverted. This is because,
being so highly aroused, introverts tend to "overload" more readily,
especially in highly stimulating (noisy, varied, colorful, eventful)
environments. When this happens, introverts tend to close down in order to
control or to limit the level of incoming stimulation and to make sense of
everything they have already taken in.
By contrast, those of us who are only minimally aroused
take in much less information second per second than the average person
and may subsequently need to augment or increase the "volume" of the
stimulation around us. This leads others to see us as extraverted. This is
because, being only minimally aroused, extraverts tend to not think
clearly or even fall asleep if they do not receive more stimulation from
the outside environment. For this reason, extraverts are commonly found
increasing the volume of stimulation in their environment. They turn on
the TV and radio. They open the door and invite the dogs and or children
to come in. They turn on the radio while reading, or move to a noisy place
to read.
Finally, it seems, many people, about 70% of the
population wake up at just the right level of arousal, to be alert and
able to think clearly, but not so alert so as to be vulnerable to being
overwhelmed by intense stimulation. Given their Balanced arousal level,
these people are able to manage well in a wide range of jobs and
environments, by scheduling an oppositely inclined activity immediately
following any activity which is either highly extraverted or
introverted.
Given the above, it is possible to understand the
following definitions for Extraversion and Introversion as well as to
understand their implications for an individual.
Having a naturally low level of arousal which
causes the individual to seek higher than normal levels of stimulation in
order to "feel alive."
Typical ways in which the extravert seeks stimulation
include: trying to influence or control his or her environment;
confronting others; engaging in competition; attending crowded parties or
events "where the action is".
Having a naturally high level of arousal which
causes the individual to seek lower than normal levels of stimulation in
order to not feel overwhelmed.
Over a period of years, this need to not be overwhelmed
by external stimulation develops into an internally focused thinking style
which may seem withdrawn, meditative, quiet, or even reclusive to more
extraverted persons. Typical ways in which the introvert seeks to control
the level of stimulation include: spending time reading, reflecting, or
otherwise alone; avoiding or being accommodating to others; competing
mostly with oneself or self image; going to small parties or out of the
way places.
Additionally, it is important and helpful to understand
the:
- Physiology of Chronic Anxiety
When we are subjected to some type of chronic anxiety for
months or years, it is our R.A.S. which shifts its set point so that we
are continually more alert in our general waking state. Subsequently, we
naturally become more introverted until we address the source of our
chronic anxiety. Although somewhat disorienting, this shift is fully
reasonable as it causes us to be more introspective, thereby increasing
the chances that we will notice that we are living under some types of
chronic anxiety which is "frightening" us and causing us to live on edge,
always a bit in fear. As such anxiety is usually the result of some life
choice we have made or some way we are living our lives, the increased
level of introspection increases the probability that we will see the
problem at the level of the problem and solve it. When this is done and
the source of our anxiety is resolved, we can quite naturally return to
our normal level of wakefulness.
Subsequently, by juxtaposing what we have learned
physiologically, with Jung’s own observations on extraversion and
introversion, we have a clearer appreciation for Jung and as well as tools
such as the MBTI and BTSA, others are using to help people apply Jung’s
model to empower and guide themselves. Here for example are five
questions, which have left many people confused about Jung, Type or the
MBTI for several years. In the light of the new information science
provides, the confusion surrounding each question dissolves.
- Jung saw Introversion as "saying no to life" and at the same time, a
natural, normal way of being?
According to Dr. Hans Eysenck, Jung was 100% correct
when he said that Introversion is a normal and healthy way in which many
people live life, based on their physiology. At the same time, Jung was
also 100% correct when he noticed that at least some Introverts seem to
be saying no to life.
In point of fact, Introverts actually take in so much
information second per second that they might be said to be "gulping in
information" - a definite yes to life. Yet, the fact that overly loud
environments in which a lot is happening can cause them to be
"overwhelmed" can cause them to appear to be saying – in that highly
stimulating context – no to life, when in fact what they are saying no
to is simply the experience of being overwhelmed.
As well, some Introverts develop a negative attitude
towards life as a result of being continually shamed or devalued when
they live in a culture which seems to value and reward Extraversion more
than Introversion. This is certainly the finding of Elaine Aron in
The Highly Sensitive Person: How to Thrive When the World Overwhelms
You.
Yet another factor which "gives Introverts a bad name"
is this one. Many people, under chronic anxiety – brought about by many
consecutive years of high stress – develop a negative attitude because
of the stress they have had to face. At the same time, these people
experience a shift as a result of the chronic anxiety, in their arousal
system. They become more Introverted. Indeed some natural Extraverts
become so "stressed out" their arousal shift so much they actually
appear to be Introverts. All these people – who are experiencing a
higher level of Introversion as a result of chronic anxiety – reinforce
the older belief that "Introverts say no to life."
- Why are Extraverts sometimes mistakenly identified as Feeling Types?
Many Extraverted people have been thought to be Feelers
when they were actually natural Sensors, Thinkers or Intuitives. The
reason is that all Extraverts are attracted to people because people are
a dependable source of stimulation – from conversations to playing games
to fighting or arguing. Quite often, in a business meeting, someone will
identify another person as "a real people person". This person may be a
Feeler, but he or she is just as likely to be a Sensor, Thinker or
Intuitive.
- Why do those working with the MBTI sometimes have difficulty
determining whether a person is actually Extraverted or Introverted?
The answer here is two fold. On the one hand some
people according to Eysenck actually have a Balanced level of arousal
such that they are neither highly Extraverted or Introverted. On the
other hand, people do shift in response to chronic anxiety. Some people
who are naturally Extraverted may appear markedly less so as a
result.
- Why some persons profiled with the MBTI two or more times several
years apart report being told they were Introverted on one occasion and
Extraverted on another occasion – or visa versa.
As noted above, a natural Extravert may measure as
Introverted when he or she has been living for some years in a state of
heightened anxiety. Prior to this period of stress and anxiety, the
person may well measure as an Extravert. Subsequent to the onset of this
period of stress / anxiety, the person may well measure Introverted. And
yet, again, when the source of stress and anxiety has been resolved, the
person might be tested again and be found to be once more
Extraverted.
- Why do Extraverts and Introverts need to take their Extraversion /
Introversion into account when seeking or designing a comfortable place
to work.
Extraverts may be given a job that matches their natural
lead function, but which is generally done in an isolated or subdued
environment. When this happens, the Extravert will attempt to remedy the
"problem" he senses internally as he notices he has difficulty focusing
and or is falling asleep. He or she will adjust their environment so that
they feel and actually are alert. They could do this by: 1) leaving their
place of work for an area in which there is more happening – where there
are other people talking or where there is more noise in general; or 2)
increasing the noise / stimulation level where they work, by turning on a
radio or if there are any other people working in the same area, starting
to talk to these people.
Similarly, Introverts may be given a job that matches
their natural lead function, but which is generally done in the midst of
lots of "action" or in an environment which is in some other way intensely
stimulating: because there is a fire, or a crisis, for example. When this
happens, the Introvert will attempt to remedy the "problem" he senses
internally as he notices he has difficulty concentrating and to some
extent is feeling overwhelmed by what is going on around him. He or she
will adjust their environment so that they feel and actually are
comfortable and once again able to focus. They could do this by: 1)
leaving their place of work for an area in which there is less happening –
where there are fewer people talking or where there is very little noise;
or 2) decreasing the noise / stimulation level where they work, by closing
their office door, wearing ear-plugs, or if there are any other people
working in the same area, asking them to not talk so much / so loudly – or
go somewhere else to talk.
By contrast, those which Eysenck identifies as having a
Balanced arousal level, have an easier time when trying to assure their
own peak performance. While at work they may "adjust" to satisfy their
employer, or their own drive to be successful, so that can work in an
Extraverted, Balanced or Introverted environment. The difficulty is that
if they adjust at work to perform a job which is more Extraverted, they
will use the evening to achieve Balance – by Introverting, which may mean
they do not spend much time or energy with their spouse or children, or
dating for that matter. By contrast, if they adjust at work to do a job
that is more Introverted, the person will use the evening to achieve
Balance by Extraverting – partying, dancing etc.
So we see, bringing neuroscience to bear on Jung’s model
can enhance our appreciation for Jung’s model while, at the same time,
helping us to apply his model with greater sensitivity and accuracy.
Bibliography on Extraversion / Introversion
For those wishing to read more in-depth and technical
sources, the following bibliography is recommended.
- Aron, Elaine W. The Highly Sensitive Person: How to Thrive When
the World Overwhelms You. Birch Lane Press, 1996.
- Eysenck, Hans J. A Model of Personality. Springer-Verlag.
Berlin 1981
- Hafen, Brent Q. Mind/Body Health: The Effects of Attitudes,
Emotions and Relationships. Simon & Schuster / Allyn & Bacon
1996.
- Justice, Blair, Ph.D. Who Gets Sick: How Beliefs, Moods and
Thoughts Affect Your Health. Jeremy P. Tarcher, Inc. Los Angeles,
1987.
- Konner, Melvin. The Tangled Wing: Biological Constraints on the
Human Spirit. Holt Reinhart & Winston. New York 1982.
- Loye, David. The Sphinx and the Rainbow: Brain Mind and Future
Vision. New Science Library / Shambhala. London & Boulder. 1983.
- Schlain, Leonard. The Alphabet Versus the Goddess: The Conflict
Between Word and Image. Viking. New York 1998.
- Totora, Gerald J. Principles of Anatomy and Physiology
7th edition. Harper Collins. 1992.
Prepared by Katherine Benziger, Ph.D.
For the course "The
Physiological Bases of Type and Extraversion/Introversion"
Offered by:
http://www.cgjungpage.org/
©
March 1998; September 1999
![Feather pen]()
[What's
New?] [Introduction to C.G.
Jung] [Jungian
Resources]
[Online
Events] [Psychology and
Culture] [Jungian
Articles]
[Guest
Book] [Editorial] [Bulletin Board]
[Web Sites] [Support This Site] [Archives]